000			01373cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250112052939.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVanier, Alain _eauthor
245	0	0	_aTotem and Taboo, A Clinical Myth
260			_c2016.
500			_a6
520			_aThis article rereads Totem and Taboo as an obsessional way to save the father. This myth of the foundation of “social organization” is oriented around the figure of the father, an essentially neurotic arrangement that the Freudian myths give an account of. In a final interpretation of the paternal myths, Lacan will come to separate the Father-of-the-Name from the Name-of-the-Father: preceding the Name-of-the-Father is the Father-of-the-Name, he who names. The accent is thus displaced from the statement to the enunciation, to the act of saying, to this hole in the real that nomination forms. We can thus come back to Freud: in the beginning, one does not find a deficit from thinking, but rather that there is the act that conditions the very possibility of thinking.
690			_aCanguilhem
690			_aneuroscience
690			_aFreud
690			_apathological
690			_anormal
786	0		_nResearch in Psychoanalysis | o 21 | 1 | 2016-05-31 | p. 54-61 | 1767-5448
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-research-in-psychoanalysis1-2016-1-page-54?lang=en
999			_c208425 _d208425