000			02209cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250112053042.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMerot, Patrick _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFrom One Myth to the Other: From Totem and Taboo to Overview of the Transference Neuroses
260			_c2016.
500			_a8
520			_aSi tout oppose Totem et Tabou et Vue d’ensemble des névroses de transfert, il demeure quelque chose de commun dans leur inspiration, puisque chacun de ces textes fait surgir un mythe fondateur. Il s’agit donc de les rapprocher, afin de constater qu’un de ces mythes est devenu absolument central dans la pensée freudienne, alors que l’autre y a une place accessoire et quasi honteuse. Comment comprendre des destins théoriques aussi divergents ? Reprenant l’ensemble des enjeux inhérents à ces deux textes pratiquement concurrents, l’auteur soutient que prolonger l’élaboration du mythe proposé dans la Vue d’ensemble… aurait conduit le fondateur de la psychanalyse à des remaniements de fond de sa métapsychologie, auxquels, en 1915, Freud n’était pas prêt.
520			_aWhile Totem and Taboo and Overview of the Transference Neuroses are worlds apart, there is a common point in their inspiration, since each of these texts highlights a founding myth. Therefore, this article will compare them in order to show how one of these myths has become absolutely central in Freudian thought, while the other holds an ancillary and almost shameful place. How are we to understand such divergent theoretical destinies? Returning to what is at stake in these two texts, which are practically simultaneous, we maintain that extending the elaboration of the myth that is put forward in the Overview would have led the founder of psychoanalysis to fundamental revisions to his metapsychology, which in 1915 Freud was not ready for.
690			_aCanguilhem
690			_aneuroscience
690			_aFreud
690			_apathological
690			_anormal
786	0		_nResearch in Psychoanalysis | o 21 | 1 | 2016-05-31 | p. 70-84 | 1767-5448
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-research-in-psychoanalysis1-2016-1-page-70?lang=en
999			_c208866 _d208866