000			01603cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250112053656.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aPencolé, Marc-Antoine _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCan our algorithms be more just than us?
260			_c2018.
500			_a71
520			_aThe way we spontaneously frame the problem—whether by questioning the (ir)responsibility of algorithms, or by trying to positively grant them a full subjectivity or some measure of agentivity—rests on theoretical grounds that appear to be essentially flawed. We will find a steadier ground in a theory of the co-constitution of the subjects and their technical mediations, and we will study the particular case of peer-to-peer (P2P) exchange communities, to eventually confirm the common intuition according to which the delegation of a moral or ethical decision to an algorithm may fall within the field of dispossession, yet also show that under certain circumstances, it could also be the condition of its effectivity. Certain normative demands could require the collective power that is cast into an algorithm, which then holds up the moral load, to be fulfilled—precisely on account of the factuality of the algorithm, of its exteriority to human subjectivity.
690			_aalgorithms
690			_amediation
690			_apeer-to-peer
690			_anorms
690			_atechnics
786	0		_nRevue française d'éthique appliquée | o 5 | 1 | 2018-05-14 | p. 67-80 | 2494-5757
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-d-ethique-appliquee-2018-1-page-67?lang=en
999			_c211565 _d211565