000 | 01665cam a2200241 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250112054159.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBoncourt, Thibaud _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Throssell, Katharine _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aInternational science as a resource |
260 | _c2016. | ||
500 | _a97 | ||
520 | _aHow have social sciences become internationalised? This article answers this question by comparing the creation and development of eight European organisations in five disciplines (sociology, economics, anthropology, political science and psychology). It shows that the internationalisation of the social sciences reflects several types of competition: rival scientific paradigms, but also competition between universities, or even geopolitical power relations. Internationalisation functions as a resource that can be mobilised in different arenas, in pre-existing conflicts that are indissociably intellectual and institutional. However, the use of this resource has relatively uncertain consequences. The actual practices and growth of the organisations studied here is sometimes out of step with their original objectives—indeed scientific internationalisation often seems to eventually elude the control of the actors who initiated it. | ||
690 | _ainternationalisation | ||
690 | _aresources | ||
690 | _ahistory of social sciences | ||
690 | _acomparison | ||
690 | _ascientific organisations | ||
690 | _aeurope | ||
786 | 0 | _nRevue française de sociologie | 57 | 3 | 2016-09-07 | p. 529-561 | 0035-2969 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-francaise-de-sociologie-2016-3-page-529?lang=en |
999 |
_c213484 _d213484 |