000			01488cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250112054600.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVeyne, Paul _eauthor
245	0	0	_aLegibility of Images, Propaganda, and Monarchic Pageantry in the Roman Empire
260			_c2002.
500			_a33
520			_a"It is not self-evident for any sculpted or painted image to be visible, looked at, understandable, or be destined for human eyes. Many images, like Trajan’s column, are expressive but not informative. Reception varies depending on the culture of the spectators. An image absent-mindedly sighted in passing could be very efficient. The Roman imperial coinage expressed neither political information nor political intentions, nor was it propagandist. This constitutes the differences between modern propaganda and monarchic pageantry, which was expressive and yet paid no interest in the spectators. We can distinguish between traditional power, with pageantry and love of the king; constitutional power, with possible propaganda; and charismatic power (Augustus), with charisma in the true sense of the word."
690			_apropaganda
690			_ainformation
690			_aAugustus
690			_aTrajan’s Column
690			_akingly magnificence
690			_aRoman imperial coinage
786	0		_nRevue historique | o 621 | 1 | 2002-03-01 | p. 3-30 | 0035-3264
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-revue-historique-2002-1-page-3?lang=en
999			_c215213 _d215213