000			02050cam a2200217 4500500
005			20260412000629.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBourdin, Jean-Claude _eauthor
245	0	0	_aMarx et le lumpenprolétariat
260			_c2013.
500			_a83
520			_aMarx and the LumpenproletariatMarx’s use of the word “lumpenproletariat” first strikes us by its violence: the term functions as a derogatory stigmatization of heterogeneous groups whose social position is essentially one that is determined by the sphere of exchange and pure circulation in a service economy. The study of Marx’s use of the term demonstrates that it is not a concept: it alludes to the problem posed by the participation of proletarians in the repression of June 1848 or by the lazzaroni in the failure of the liberal revolutions. The term does not designate a “class”. Its use is rather to identify a type of behavior evident at all levels of the society: predation, enrichment by misappropriation, the improductive speculations undertaken by the “ declasses” of a society’s “ Bohème”. The hypothesis advanced here is that Marx’s articulation between the lumpenproletariat and the importance of the ethical evaluation of its tenuous relation to work partly derives from the Hegelian conception of poverty (the “social question”). An analysis of the “inhuman” needs and the speculative deduction of the proletariat in 1844 demonstrates that the negative determinations of the proletariat establish the lumpenproletariat as the proletariat of the proletariat. The difference is then located in the revolutionary subjectivity of the proletarians, to which the members of the lumpenproletariat do not accede.
690			_aethic
690			_alumpenproletariat
690			_aproletariat
690			_arevolution
690			_avagabonds
786	0		_nActuel Marx | 54 | 2 | 2013-10-03 | p. 39-55 | 0994-4524
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-actuel-marx-2013-2-page-39?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c2210589 _d2210589