000 02561cam a2200301zu 4500
001 41003043
003 FRCYB41003043
005 20250107124613.0
006 m o d
007 cr un
008 250107s2008 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020 _a9781848552906
035 _aFRCYB41003043
040 _aFR-PaCSA
_ben
_c
_erda
100 1 _aO'Leary, Rosemary
245 0 1 _aPushing the Boundaries : New Frontiers in Conflict Resolution and Collaboration
_bResearch in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change Vol 29
_c["O'Leary, Rosemary", 'Fleishman, Rachel', 'Gerard, Catherine']
264 1 _bEmerald Group Publishing Limited
_c2008
300 _a p.
336 _btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _bc
_2rdamdedia
338 _bc
_2rdacarrier
650 0 _a
700 0 _aO'Leary, Rosemary
700 0 _aFleishman, Rachel
700 0 _aGerard, Catherine
856 4 0 _2Cyberlibris
_uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/41003043
_qtext/html
_a
520 _aThe research papers in this volume were initially presented at a conference, entitled 'Cutting Edge Theories and Recent Developments in Conflict Resolution', which celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Program on the Analysis and Resolution of Conflict (PARC). Presenters were encouraged to submit their papers for consideration, and following a rigorous peer review and revision process, nine articles were accepted. The volume explores some of the major themes of conflict analysis, including how powerful dominant discourses can both soothe and exacerbate conflict, the role of civic organizations in promoting peace and incubating democratic principles, the ways in which different forms of dialogue are used to heal historically dysfunctional inter-group relations, and the importance of a deeply institutional, structural understanding of ethnocentrism and racism.The authors conducted their research in several different countries - the U.S., Canada, Bosnia, and Northern Ireland - and used a wide range of analytical techniques including in-depth interviews, surveys, and document analysis. What holds them together is the rigorous tie they make between theory and empirical data. Some authors have built conflict theory inductively, based on their own research and/or secondary sources (e.g. Keles, Coy, et al, and Funk-Unrau), while others have tested existing models with empirical data (e.g. Hemmer, Getha-Taylor, and Pincock). These articles collectively make a solid contribution to theoretical development in the conflict analysis field.
999 _c25277
_d25277