000			02859cam a2200277zu 4500
001			88833443
003			FRCYB88833443
005			20250106111927.0
006			m o d
007			cr un
008			250106s2013 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020			_a9780691158280
035			_aFRCYB88833443
040			_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda
100	1		_aChwe, Michael Suk-Young
245	0	1	_aRational Ritual _bCulture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge _c['Chwe, Michael Suk-Young']
264		1	_bPrinceton University Press _c2013
300			_a p.
336			_btxt _2rdacontent
337			_bc _2rdamdedia
338			_bc _2rdacarrier
650		0	_a
700	0		_aChwe, Michael Suk-Young
856	4	0	_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88833443 _qtext/html _a
520			_aWhy do Internet, financial service, and beer commercials dominate Super Bowl advertising? How do political ceremonies establish authority? Why does repetition characterize anthems and ritual speech? Why were circular forms favored for public festivals during the French Revolution? This book answers these questions using a single concept: common knowledge. Game theory shows that in order to coordinate its actions, a group of people must form "common knowledge." Each person wants to participate only if others also participate. Members must have knowledge of each other, knowledge of that knowledge, knowledge of the knowledge of that knowledge, and so on. Michael Chwe applies this insight, with striking erudition, to analyze a range of rituals across history and cultures. He shows that public ceremonies are powerful not simply because they transmit meaning from a central source to each audience member but because they let audience members know what other members know. For instance, people watching the Super Bowl know that many others are seeing precisely what they see and that those people know in turn that many others are also watching. This creates common knowledge, and advertisers selling products that depend on consensus are willing to pay large sums to gain access to it. Remarkably, a great variety of rituals and ceremonies, such as formal inaugurations, work in much the same way. By using a rational-choice argument to explain diverse cultural practices, Chwe argues for a close reciprocal relationship between the perspectives of rationality and culture. He illustrates how game theory can be applied to an unexpectedly broad spectrum of problems, while showing in an admirably clear way what game theory might hold for scholars in the social sciences and humanities who are not yet acquainted with it. In a new afterword, Chwe delves into new applications of common knowledge, both in the real world and in experiments, and considers how generating common knowledge has become easier in the digital age.
999			_c3004 _d3004