| 000 | 01547cam a2200205 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250117224859.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aLinhart, Danièle _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aDe la domination et de son déni |
| 260 | _c2011. | ||
| 500 | _a98 | ||
| 520 | _aOn Domination and its DenialThis article explains how corporate management and shareholders gradually succeeded in introducing new modes of domination designed to counter the wave of worker insubordination in the post-1968 period. It shows how the systematic individualisation of the management of wage-earners, placed in a situation of mutual competition, the pressures exerted on them through the procedures of individualised objectives and permanent evaluation, and the orchestration of the objective and subjective contingency of workers, transformed the conditions of wage-employment. From a condition which could be inscribed by those subjected to it within a horizon of collective resistance, domination came to be experienced as a plight of personal suffering. Such trends are not however irreversible, insofar as the logic of individualisation and contingency now tends to come into conflict with other factors, such as the attachment of wage-earners to their work. | ||
| 690 | _aindividualisation | ||
| 690 | _adomination | ||
| 690 | _amanagement | ||
| 690 | _acontingency | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nActuel Marx | 49 | 1 | 2011-05-19 | p. 90-103 | 0994-4524 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-actuel-marx-2011-1-page-90?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c305625 _d305625 |
||