| 000 | 01837cam a2200181 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250118065504.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBalzacq, Thierry _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Cornut, Jérémie _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Ramel, Frédéric _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aLes Global International Relations comme alternative à la discipline hégémonique. Le cas des Relations internationales en France |
| 260 | _c2017. | ||
| 500 | _a5 | ||
| 520 | _aGlobal International Relations as Alternative to the American Mainstream: The Case of International Relations in France Where do French internationalists stand within the global discipline? This article demonstrates that international relations in France are not independent of, isolated from or peripheral to global trends. Data from the 2014 TRIP survey reveals that, while the discipline in France is distinguished from and even, in some respects, conflicts with the American mainstream, it nevertheless contributes in its way to Global International Relations (GIR). Based on linguistic, theoretical, methodological, epistemological and institutional dynamics differing from those that dominate the discipline in the United States, GIR is at once global and possesses significant local and/ or national foundations. In both theoretical and epistemological terms, French international relations is linked to this pluralist alternative by virtue of the concepts and disciplinary practices characteristic of French internationalists. By showing that the internationalists of the North can also, in their way, contribute to GIR, this article gives the notion new depth. ■ | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nCritique internationale | 74 | 1 | 2017-01-06 | p. 69-93 | 1290-7839 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/revue-critique-internationale-2017-1-page-69?lang=fr&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c366060 _d366060 |
||