000			02181cam a2200277zu 4500
001			88867128
003			FRCYB88867128
005			20250107153947.0
006			m o d
007			cr un
008			250107s2019 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d
020			_a9781433158414
035			_aFRCYB88867128
040			_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda
100	1		_aLesigues, Lope
245	0	1	_aArchaeology of Play _bThe Re-Discovery of Platonic-Aristotelian Tripartivism in Interdisciplinary Discourses _c['Lesigues, Lope']
264		1	_bPeter Lang _c2019
300			_a p.
336			_btxt _2rdacontent
337			_bc _2rdamdedia
338			_bc _2rdacarrier
650		0	_a
700	0		_aLesigues, Lope
856	4	0	_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88867128 _qtext/html _a
520			_aArchaeology of Play: The Re-Discovery of Platonic-Aristotelian Tripartivism in Interdisciplinary Discourses proposes that play's antithesis is not seriousness but rather one-dimensionality. This book argues that the rediscovery of Platonic-Aristotelian tripartivism lends to a more expansive appreciation of play in terms of three rhetorical registers?namely, skholé, agon, and paidia. Scholastic play resides in leisure and contemplation. Agonistics is realmed in competition, contests, and power-play, while paidiatics is expressed in lowly ruses, trickeries, recreation, and amusement of the low-bred and the subaltern. By subjecting play to the tripartite lens, Archaeology of Play highlights vital surpluses and lacunae in the treatment of the subject matter and therefore yields a refreshing, re-politicized understanding of play dynamics in the different fields of human endeavor. Furthermore, Bourdieu's and Rancière's lusory discourses redeem play from the pitfalls of triadic over-schematization by thinking beyond tripartivism. The lively interlocution with other play theorists?Pieper, Kant, Schiller, Marcuse, Gadamer, Veblen, Arendt, Lyotard, Derrida, Foucault, Bakhtin, de Certeau, among others?adds substance to the mix where play becomes a critical resource for politics, aesthetics, and the democratic reordering of sociality.
999			_c39727 _d39727