000 | 01824cam a2200229 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250119093135.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aBidet, Jacques _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aModernity and Global History |
260 | _c2013. | ||
500 | _a7 | ||
520 | _aThe cyclical standpoint involved in world-system theories—which climaxes in the question: Who will be the next hegemon?—would appear to neutralize the Marxist perspective of the ultimate goal: the end of capitalism and class domination. “Global history” offers a profound renewal of our historical knowledge, questioning some of the classical claims of Marxism. In line with the argument made by the author in L’État-monde (2011), it is nevertheless argued here that one cannot be satisfied with a purely systemic conception of the present time. Modernity is a fact not only of the (world-)system but also of (class) structure, “classes” being understood here in terms of a state institution within a nation-state. As a result of the technological developments which it propels, capitalist modernity possesses a structural tendency that leads from a nation-state to a world (class) state that is involved in the world-system. In this sense, the present time can be defined as that of ultimodernity. In this ecological terminus, the human species forms a (class-structured) political community. The tasks of Marxism thus return and are restated in a more complex and more uncertain mode. | ||
690 | _ametastructure | ||
690 | _amarxism | ||
690 | _aglobal history | ||
690 | _aworld-system | ||
690 | _amodernity | ||
690 | _aworld state | ||
786 | 0 | _nActuel Marx | o 53 | 1 | 2013-05-01 | p. 106-120 | 0994-4524 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-actuel-marx-2013-1-page-106?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c407207 _d407207 |