000			01583cam a2200289 4500500
005			20250119095124.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aAriew, Roger _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe Port Royal Logic, the First Cartesians, and Late Scholasticism
260			_c2015.
500			_a34
520			_aThe two related questions I wish to pose are as follows: To what extent can the Port Royal Logic be considered a Cartesian logic, and to what extent does it differ from previous logics? My response will consist in a series of comparisons between what Descartes called his logic, what the self-avowed first generation of followers of Descartes considered to be Cartesian logic, and developments in seventeenth-century scholastic logic. I conclude that the logic produced by the Cartesians merely reinforced certain developments in seventeenth-century scholastic logic. The Port Royal Logic, which, for the Cartesians of the end of the seventeenth century, was the Cartesian logic par excellence, also has many traits in common with neo-scholastic logic.
690			_aDialectics
690			_aApprehension
690			_aMethod
690			_aLate scholasticism
690			_aSyllogism
690			_aPort-Royal
690			_aKey words
690			_aArt of thinking
690			_aCartesian logic
690			_aAristotelism
690			_aJudgement
786	0		_nArchives de philosophie | Volume 78 | 1 | 2015-01-23 | p. 29-48 | 0003-9632
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-de-philosophie-2015-1-page-29?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c408413 _d408413