000 01531cam a2200253 4500500
005 20250119100026.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aSmadja, David
_eauthor
245 0 0 _a1990–2000: A new reception of Leo Strauss in France
260 _c2023.
500 _a33
520 _aBy interviewing Corine Pelluchon and Daniel Tanguay and analyzing their remarks, we put forward another version of Strauss transformed by a new context of scholarly and social uses. This background differs from the context of the 1950s, which centered on the crucial role of Raymond Aron and Alexandre Kojève in introducing Straussian political thought to France. The framing that characterizes Pelluchon and Tanguay’s approach is different in the sense that they do not belong to the same generation. Consequently, they endorse a historical—and non-ideological—perspective that leads them to emphasize the theological-political problem and to consider themselves mainly as introducers and translators of a new corpus.
690 _acirculation of ideas
690 _atheological-political problem
690 _apolitical philosophy
690 _aLeo Strauss
690 _acirculation of ideas
690 _atheological-political problem
690 _apolitical philosophy
690 _aLeo Strauss
786 0 _nArchives de philosophie | Volume 86 | 2 | 2023-03-30 | p. 121-139 | 0003-9632
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-de-philosophie-2023-2-page-121?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c409060
_d409060