000			01674cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250119103348.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aPierron, Jean-Philippe _eauthor
245	0	0	_aThe “right” meaning of punishment
260			_c2023.
500			_a36
520			_aIt is too quickly said from outside, from a distance, from above, that punishment has meaning. For if there is meaning, it lies in the balance that always needs to be found. It is never a once-and-for-all meaning in spite of what one might too quickly infer from a procedural reading of an instrumental rationality of the world, from a growing bureaucratisation of what goes on and is experienced in prison. The balance between different priorities - punishing, containing, rehabilitating - has to be invented. Between the short-term purpose of the sentence as punishment and the longer-term aim of the sentence to amend, pacify and potentially rehabilitate the person, is there not a pathway to be invented: from the probable to the probative side of probation? Is that not why, rather than juxtaposing punishment, amoral restraint and rehabilitation, there is a need to find a way of articulating them that would be the core of the work done in prison: focusing on the relationship between staff and prisoners and seeing past the procedural risk?
690			_aPEINE
690			_aPrison
690			_aProbation
690			_aVengeance
690			_aSurveillance
786	0		_nLes Cahiers de la Justice | o 2 | 2 | 2023-06-19 | p. 215-229 | 1958-3702
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2023-2-page-215?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c411019 _d411019