000			01718cam a2200325 4500500
005			20250119112804.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aFarriol, Cristóbal _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFreud’s division: between art and Witz
260			_c2022.
500			_a76
520			_aWhat about a Freudian aesthetic? Taking the texts in which Freud openly discusses art as a reference, it would be an aesthetic whose conservative taste in art drastically contrasts with the subversive nature of his discovery of the subconscious. With Freud being divided between a Victorian and a subversive character, we propose that another Freudian aesthetic is possible if we disregard the texts that focus on art and concentrate on those that deal with jokes. We will discuss how the issue of sense within nonsense is as much present in his texts about art as in his Witz (joke) analysis. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that Freud’s stance on art seems more inclined toward meaning, whereas his Witz analysis finds a way to go beyond meaning. This is thanks to a notion as much present in “Creative Writers and Day-Dreaming” as in “Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious”: playing.
690			_achild
690			_aWitz
690			_aart
690			_asense
690			_aFreud
690			_aplaying
690			_anonsense
690			_achild
690			_aWitz
690			_aart
690			_asense
690			_aFreud
690			_aplaying
690			_anonsense
786	0		_nCliniques méditerranéennes | o 106 | 2 | 2022-11-02 | p. 225-240 | 0762-7491
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cliniques-mediterraneennes-2022-2-page-225?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c414472 _d414472