000			01871cam a2200313 4500500
005			20250119113347.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aPheulpin, Marie-Christine _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Pinel, Jean-Pierre _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDo intercultural research groups in the clinical human sciences involve specific psychic work?
260			_c2023.
500			_a71
520			_aBased on their experiences as researchers, the authors identify and characterize the obstacles, and even the impasses, encountered in setting up an inter-university and international research group – “an inter group” – in the field of the human sciences. They propose an analysis based on the paradigm of psychoanalysis in extension. After describing the moments that were inherent to the setting up of the research group, they define its specific organisers: the carrier duo, the interpreter and the objects of relating. They put forward the hypothesis that the group process requires the deployment of specific psychic work in three dimensions: the constitution of an “inter” group presupposes not only an elucidation of narcissistic issues – individual, group and institutional – but also the unravelling of unconscious alliances and the elaboration of cultural and institutional “incorporats”.
690			_ainternational research
690			_aotherness
690			_aHuman sciences
690			_apsychoanalysis in extension
690			_agroup
690			_aorganisers
690			_ainternational research
690			_aotherness
690			_aHuman sciences
690			_apsychoanalysis in extension
690			_agroup
690			_aorganisers
786	0		_nConnexions | o 119 | 2 | 2023-11-30 | p. 179-190 | 0337-3126
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-connexions-2023-2-page-179?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c414916 _d414916