000 01554cam a2200289 4500500
005 20250119121837.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aAudegean, Philippe
_eauthor
700 1 0 _a Noûs, Camille
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aAt the sources of criminal arithmetics: Pity and self-love
260 _c2021.
500 _a26
520 _aIn Chapter XXX of Des Délits et des peines, Beccaria broaches the issue of judiciary time: not only that of penal procedure but also that of the prescription of crime. In order to fight against arbitrariness, he puts forward a mathematical model which may serve as a standard to determine these durations by law. This analysis leads him, nevertheless, to a qualitative (but not quantitative) leap between two types of offenses: the damage to property and the damage to persons. Anthropology then takes over from arithmetics when it comes to justifying this solution of continuity between the right to live (which relates to natural rights) and the right to property (which relates to societal rights).
690 _aBeccaria
690 _acriminal law
690 _anatural law
690 _aprescription
690 _ameasurement of penalties
690 _aBeccaria
690 _acriminal law
690 _anatural law
690 _aprescription
690 _ameasurement of penalties
786 0 _nDix-huitième siècle | o 53 | 1 | 2021-06-28 | p. 655-672 | 0070-6760
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-dix-huitieme-siecle-2021-1-page-655?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c418152
_d418152