| 000 | 01041cam a2200157 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250119124101.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aHeinich, Nathalie _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aNot every bit of truth is fit for deliberation |
| 260 | _c2019. | ||
| 500 | _a15 | ||
| 520 | _aThe polysemy of the word “truth”, at least in so far as it refers to a value, makes it necessary to specify its many meanings in different fields - scientific, religious, ethical, aesthetic and so on. Applied to the question of truth in a democracy, these distinctions make it possible to argue in favour of a clear separation between scientific truth and civic truth: the only truth that democracy needs is civic (transparency and veracity of information), whereas scientific truth should not concern it any more than democracy should govern scientific activity. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nDiogenes | o 261-262 | 1 | 2019-10-18 | p. 99-106 | 0419-1633 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-diogene-2018-1-page-99?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c419747 _d419747 |
||