000			02020cam a2200325 4500500
005			20250119124248.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMongy, Aymeric _eauthor
245	0	0	_aAre rights a mask for budgetary rigor? Local implementation of Rights for People with Disabilities
260			_c2023.
500			_a6
520			_aSince the beginning of the 2010s, the medico-social establishment has been the subject of strong criticism. This context invites us to question the concrete scope of the gains made by disabled people and their organizations in terms of rights to care. Our article aims to understand how the work of implementing rights interacts with the agenda of local public institutions, which is largely determined by the imperative to reduce expenditures. To this end, it mobilizes a localized investigation of the struggles and appropriations around a new right, instituted at the end of a parental judicial offensive and supposed to guarantee an effective and individualized “response” to each request for support. The survey shows that, subject to the strategic investments by their project managers, these “responses” addressed to people in the disability field are less effective rights than an instrument of managerial rationalization that circumvents the demands for additional resources.
690			_aSociology of law
690			_aDisability politics
690			_aTerritorial management
690			_aPolicy implementation
690			_aPublic action
690			_aDisability studies
690			_aPolitics of rights
690			_aSociology of law
690			_aDisability politics
690			_aTerritorial management
690			_aPolicy implementation
690			_aPublic action
690			_aDisability studies
690			_aPolitics of rights
786	0		_nDroit et société | o 113 | 1 | 2023-08-24 | p. 91-110 | 0769-3362
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-droit-et-societe-2023-1-page-91?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c419867 _d419867