000			01517cam a2200205 4500500
005			20250121024800.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aLinhart, Danièle _eauthor
245	0	0	_aDomination and Its Denial
260			_c2011.
500			_a52
520			_aThis article explains how corporate management and shareholders gradually succeeded in introducing new modes of domination designed to counter the wave of worker insubordination in the post-1968 period. It shows how the systematic individualization of the management of wage- earners, placed in a situation of mutual competition, the pressures exerted on them through the procedures of individualized objectives and permanent evaluation, and the orchestration of the objective and subjective contingency of workers, transformed the conditions of wage-employment. From a condition which could be inscribed by those subjected to it within a horizon of collective resistance, domination came to be experienced as a plight of personal suffering. Such trends are not however irreversible, insofar as the logic of individualization and contingency now tends to come into conflict with other factors, such as the attachment of wage-earners to their work.
690			_aindividualisation
690			_adomination
690			_amanagement
690			_acontingency
786	0		_nActuel Marx | o 49 | 1 | 2011-05-19 | p. 90-103 | 0994-4524
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-actuel-marx-2011-1-page-90?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c450737 _d450737