000			02130cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121025538.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aAmossé, Thomas _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Penissat, Étienne _eauthor
245	0	0	_aHierarchical ordering or grouping by field of activity? The double asymmetry of ordinary representations on occupations
260			_c2019.
500			_a15
520			_aBased on a digital tablet survey system, this article investigates the ordinary representations of social space. How do individuals delimit two social groups among a closed set of 11 occupations to a limited fraction of the social space? The respondents’ classifications, carried out successively on occupations classically considered as belonging to the “top” and “bottom” of the social space, demonstrate first of all the ever-present strength of the opposition between the occupations of “employés” (clerical or public) and of “ouvriers” (manual): they function as salient points that delimit the main internal cleavage between the working classes. For the executives and business managers occupations, three representations (positional, statutory and functional) emerge of the classifications, the first of which is clearly hierarchical. The opposition between the public and private sector plays a transversal role in both games. The article concludes that there is a double asymmetry in ordinary representations: professional and social hierarchies are more often mentioned for and by individuals occupying a higher position in society, while transversal oppositions (statutory or functional) are more often used for and by those who are at a lower level in the scale of occupations and social positions.
690			_aSocial Boundaries
690			_aEmployment Status
690			_aSocial and Professional Hierarchies
690			_aOccupations
690			_aOrdinary Representations
786	0		_nL’Année sociologique | 69 | 2 | 2019-07-29 | p. 511-539 | 0066-2399
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-l-annee-sociologique-2019-2-page-511?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c451632 _d451632