000 01587cam a2200277 4500500
005 20250121025716.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aMarrou, Élise
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aSelf-portrait of Blumenberg as a Viennese therapist. De nobis ipsis silemus
260 _c2016.
500 _a80
520 _aIn this article, I claim that Wittgenstein is not merely an interlocutor among others for Blumenberg, but one of his doubles. I show how the author of The Legitimacy of the Modern Age appropriates and integrates the main lines of Wittgenstein’s thought into the construction of his own phenomenological method. To that end, three axes are distinguished (from the three periods of Wittgenstein’s oeuvre) and analyzed: the Tractatus’s definition of the world, the treatment of indeterminacy ( Unbestimmtheit) in the use of concepts and the anti-Cartesian re-qualification of certainty. I argue that these elements offer a mirror image of Blumenberg’s phenomenological enterprise, an “etching” of his hermeneutics, nothing less, all and all, than a self-portrait.
690 _aSolipsism
690 _aWittgenstein
690 _aGleichnis
690 _aSkepticism
690 _aCertainty
690 _aDescartes
690 _aBlumenberg
690 _aModernity
690 _aPhenomenological description
690 _aMetaphor
786 0 _nArchives de philosophie | Volume 79 | 1 | 2016-02-04 | p. 109-120 | 0003-9632
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-de-philosophie-2016-1-page-109?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c451861
_d451861