000 01758cam a2200301 4500500
005 20250121030347.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aQuelennec, Bruno
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aA transatlantic mirror game
260 _c2023.
500 _a28
520 _aBased on the principle that the reasons for the politicization (or neutralization) of theoretical references to Leo Strauss can only be elucidated by considering together the philosopher’s writings and their various receptions, this article begins with a short intellectual biography, divided into six different “sequences.” We insist on the “polyphonic” dimension of Strauss’s work, which seems to authorize the most contradictory readings. In a second part, we discuss two opposite paradigms of the reception of his writings: the North American one, punctuated by polemics, and the French one, rather consensual. Toward the end of the paper, we explain how Leo Strauss could become a canonical figure in France in the context of the “return to political philosophy.”
690 _atransnational circulation of political ideas
690 _asociology of intellectuals
690 _aphilosophical receptions
690 _aLeo Strauss
690 _aGerman- Jewish philosophy
690 _aStraussianism
690 _atransnational circulation of political ideas
690 _asociology of intellectuals
690 _aphilosophical receptions
690 _aLeo Strauss
690 _aGerman- Jewish philosophy
690 _aStraussianism
786 0 _nArchives de philosophie | Volume 86 | 2 | 2023-03-30 | p. 13-33 | 0003-9632
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-archives-de-philosophie-2023-2-page-13?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c452411
_d452411