| 000 | 01118cam a2200169 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121033946.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aWeill, Sharon _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Sulzer, Jeanne _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aRights of the accused and rights of the civil parties : incompatible requirements ? |
| 260 | _c2021. | ||
| 500 | _a25 | ||
| 520 | _aThis article examines the trial of the January 2015 terror attacks in light of international trials that involved significant number of victims as civil parties. It shows that the gap that exists in terrorism trials between the harm done to victims and the charges brought against the accused risks creating irreconcilable expectations. This discrepancy can also lead the defense to denounce a show trial that undermines equality of arms. Thus, both civil parties and defendants risk falling victim to the excesses of anti-terrorist justice. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nLes Cahiers de la Justice | o 2 | 2 | 2021-08-22 | p. 351-360 | 1958-3702 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-les-cahiers-de-la-justice-2021-2-page-351?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c455669 _d455669 |
||