000			01752cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121041535.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aOppenheim-Gluckman, Hélène _eauthor
245	0	0	_aWho is paying for the cure? The case of the “rat man”
260			_c2018.
500			_a67
520			_aThe way in which the terms of payment influence transference, counter-transference, and the psychoanalytic cure, and the way in which this becomes interweaved with the issues with which the patient is concerned and his/her symptoms, is a question that requires attention in any psychoanalytic cure. The author chooses here to broach this complex subject in the light of Freud’s princeps case of the Rat Man. This case has a lot to tell us, because we have access to Freud’s notes from the sessions that took place during the first four months of the cure. The published case does not specify the fact that it was the patient’s mother who paid for the treatment with money inherited from the deceased father (which was in fact the mother’s money, because it was she who was wealthy before the marriage, not the father). Furthermore, the patient had renounced the inheritance for neurotic reasons. The author explores the issue of the circulation of money in the patient’s obsessive scenarios, and the effects of the payment procedures on the psychoanalytic cure.
690			_asetting of the psychoanalytic cure
690			_amoney
690			_atransference
690			_aFreud
690			_aRat Man
786	0		_nCliniques méditerranéennes | o  97 | 1 | 2018-03-22 | p. 121-134 | 0762-7491
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-cliniques-mediterraneennes-2018-1-page-121?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c458653 _d458653