000			01584cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121042545.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRaoul, Bruno _eauthor
245	0	0	_aTerritory as a communicational object: Between “symbolic third party” and “social discourse.” A media perspective
260			_c2017.
500			_a39
520			_aThis article shows, through some examples, how territorial markers and spatial indications can be identified in media discourse. It then explains how—by referring to spatial matter and forms and so to the history and memory specific to a community (of inhabitants)—a territory involves a “socio-spatial imagination” that is federative, partaking of a “symbolic third party.” However, whereas it is by word and by discourse that the territory takes on such a social function, the article explains how the territory—beyond the source of a founding word (its name)—is supplied by a “discursive fund” in order to be apparent, legible, identified, and justified. As a hypothesis, the author proposes that a “territorial discourse” exists and can be fitted into the global “social discourse.”
690			_aterritorial imagination
690			_apublic sphere/space
690			_aterritoriality
690			_amedia
690			_acommunication
690			_asocial discourse
786	0		_nCommunication & langages | o 193 | 3 | 2017-12-25 | p. 117-143 | 0336-1500
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-communication-et-langages1-2017-3-page-117?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c459846 _d459846