| 000 | 01534cam a2200229 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121052444.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aCox, Rachel _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPsychological Harassment at Work: Between Psychologization and Victimization |
| 260 | _c2012. | ||
| 500 | _a64 | ||
| 520 | _aThe Québec Labour Standards Act provides that every worker has a right to a work environment free from psychological harassment. A unionized worker’s recourse lies with grievance arbitration. Analysis of arbitration decisions reveals language that is often more psychological in nature than legal, especially when associated with the denial of a grievance. Arbitrators take a harsh view of complainants, directing inquiry as to whether their personality is “normal” and whether they have a mental illness. The tendency towards a psychological reading of harassment grievances effectively displaces social and organisational analysis of workplaces, even though legislative intention was to make workplaces healthier through a critical examination of work organization and exercise of management prerogatives. | ||
| 690 | _avictimization | ||
| 690 | _apsychologization | ||
| 690 | _agrievance arbitration | ||
| 690 | _apsychological harassment | ||
| 690 | _areasonable person test | ||
| 690 | _aQuébec | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nDroit et société | o 81 | 2 | 2012-09-01 | p. 343-364 | 0769-3362 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-droit-et-societe1-2012-2-page-343?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c466420 _d466420 |
||