000 | 01370cam a2200217 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250121053443.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aDupuy, Katia _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Lanfranchi, Joseph _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aAbsolute or Relative Performance: How Do French Firms Determine Their Wage Bonuses? |
260 | _c2004. | ||
500 | _a24 | ||
520 | _aThis article analyses employers’choice to base merit bonuses on relative performance. The relative element consists in comparing workers’output and its major advantage is to eliminate the mutual uncertainty they bear. However, bonuses based on relative performance theoretically encourage workers not to cooperate with their colleagues. Using a primary sample of 15,859 private-sector French firms in 1992, we show that bonuses based on relative performance are more likely to be chosen when output and sales fluctuate. In contrast, they are used less frequently when firms adopt an organisation of work based on task-sharing and cooperation between workers. | ||
690 | _aperformance | ||
690 | _arelated bonuses | ||
690 | _aorganisation of work | ||
690 | _arelative performance | ||
786 | 0 | _nEconomie & prévision | o 162 | 1 | 2004-03-01 | p. 71-94 | 0249-4744 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-economie-et-prevision-1-2004-1-page-71?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c468135 _d468135 |