000 | 01270cam a2200205 4500500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250121053604.0 | ||
041 | _afre | ||
042 | _adc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 |
_aFleckinger, Pierre _eauthor |
700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Glachant, Matthieu _eauthor |
245 | 0 | 0 | _aAre Corporate Social Responsibility and Voluntary Agreements Complementary? |
260 | _c2009. | ||
500 | _a71 | ||
520 | _aVoluntary agreements between regulators and firms have been in use for at least two decades. In recent years, however,firms have tended to commit to better environmental or social behavior in a more unilateral fashion. This phenomenon is known as the rise of “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR). In such circumstances, are voluntary agreements still welfare-enhancing? To explore this question, we use a policy game involving a regulator and a firm. We show that the answer is ambiguous. In particular, it depends on the regulator’s bargaining power. | ||
690 | _aPreemption of Public Regulation | ||
690 | _aCorporate Social Responsibility | ||
690 | _aVoluntary Agreements | ||
786 | 0 | _nEconomie & prévision | o 190-191 | 4 | 2009-12-28 | p. 95-105 | 0249-4744 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-economie-et-prevision-1-2009-4-page-95?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
999 |
_c468576 _d468576 |