000			01867cam a2200325 4500500
005			20250121054219.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aTroude-Chastenet, Patrick _eauthor
245	0	0	_aGreen peril for the blue planet?
260			_c2023.
500			_a98
520			_aIn the early nineties, two French intellectuals gave scientific support to the first manifestations of ecophobia. Thirty years on, even though climate emergency is lending relevance to previsions once deemed alarmist, the same discourse is still gaining traction, even becoming more radical. Now as then, critics of environmental thinking claim to be the only ones speaking in the name of science, dismissing their opponents as ideologues. These self-proclaimed supporters of the Enlightenment, quick to denounce as ideologically blinkered those who do not join in their acclaim of the techno-capitalistic model, detest the precautionary principle and embrace a gospel of risk-taking. We aim to demonstrate that not only is the discourse of those guardians of Reason deeply ideological, but that it hardly renews itself, recycling threadbare nostrums, and more often than not emanating from self-interested figures who have occasional links with business and the politicians and financiers who support it.
690			_aclimate
690			_arisk
690			_aAldo Leopold
690			_aHans Jonas
690			_aGérald Bronner
690			_aprecaution
690			_aLuc Ferry
690			_aclimate
690			_arisk
690			_aAldo Leopold
690			_aHans Jonas
690			_aGérald Bronner
690			_aprecaution
690			_aLuc Ferry
786	0		_nEcologie & politique | o 66 | 1 | 2023-05-17 | p. 129-148 | 1166-3030
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-ecologie-et-politique-2023-1-page-129?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c469997 _d469997