000			01645cam a2200253 4500500
005			20250121065012.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aCohen-Salmon, Julie _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Rebelo, Teresa _eauthor
245	0	0	_aWhat pleasure does the child who acts out during the latency period have in playing?
260			_c2020.
500			_a31
520			_aThe repeated recourse by children during the latency period to acting out often goes hand in hand with difficulties in playing, but also difficulties in assimilating schooling. With the children in question, in the context of sessions of analytic psychotherapy, “playing” is not there from the outset; playing is a therapeutic objective. The child may be completely disconcerted by being asked to initiate a game. This inhibition may continue for several sessions before resolving itself. The authors establish a close relationship between the “pleasure of playing”, which becomes an aim of psychotherapeutic work, and the “pleasure of thinking”. For play, surely, may be defined as a “pleasure of playing with one’s thoughts”, as the pleasure of enacting the existing links between sensory images, thing-presentations and word-presentations, that is, as a “pleasure of thinking”.
690			_aextreme experiences
690			_aChildhood
690			_aHolocaust
690			_areunions
690			_ahope
690			_atale
690			_aadversity
786	0		_nEnfances & Psy | o 85 | 1 | 2020-06-16 | p. 71-81 | 1286-5559
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-enfances-et-psy-2020-1-page-71?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c477107 _d477107