000 01422cam a2200157 4500500
005 20250121065912.0
041 _afre
042 _adc
100 1 0 _aPorge, Érik
_eauthor
245 0 0 _aFrom the Myth of Freud's Self-Analysis to the Psychoanalytical Discourse
260 _c2007.
500 _a83
520 _aDespite several articles and texts on the subject, Freud’s so-called self-ana-lysis continues to be considered as being at the origin of psychoanalysis. We will show first the deadlock of such a conception, after which we will go on to clarify the meaning behind what Freud called his Selbstanalyse. We have marked out three moments in the way he speaks of it in his correspondence with Fliess. In a second time it becomes the representative of a turning point which marks a change in discourse, in the Lacanian sense of the term, and more precisely, which marks the passage from the hysterical discourse to the analytical discourse. Achange in discourse which is tantamount to a passage to the letter, in the two meanings of the word : missive and literal. We bring to the fore the specific status of Freud’s letters to Fliess, the particularities of their publication, their circulation and their role in the analytical movement.
786 0 _nEssaim | o 19 | 2 | 2007-11-26 | p. 11-26 | 1287-258X
856 4 1 _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-essaim-2007-2-page-11?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999 _c479354
_d479354