000			01394cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121070202.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aRambeau, Frédéric _eauthor
245	0	0	_aPervert and persevere (Père-sévère). Deleuze, Lacan, perversion
260			_c2020.
500			_a27
520			_aPerversion was always an essential question for Deleuze, even a name of the critique. His praise for perversion depends on the displacements he imprints to the Freudian unconscious, and which register within two great ambitions of his philosophy: suppression of the lack and forestalling of opposition. He acknowledges a more subversive potential in perverse individuation than the hysterical model of the unconscious. Showing contending ontological choices (univocity or subjectivity, monism or dualism), the confrontation between Deleuze and Lacan on the subject of perversion reveals their different conceptions of the knotting between subjectivation and institution. It thus questions the political expansion of their diverging thoughts on the unconscious: the consequences of this in terms of critique and political division in the social realm and the question of the collective or the “group”.
786	0		_nEssaim | o 44 | 1 | 2020-03-09 | p. 115-127 | 1287-258X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-essaim-2020-1-page-115?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c480289 _d480289