000			01771cam a2200253 4500500
005			20250121075515.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aSellenet, Catherine _eauthor
245	0	0	_aAnalysis of practice as a counterpoint and counterweight to a normative approach
260			_c2024.
500			_a89
520			_aSince 2021, the legislator has required early childhood care establishments to set up practice analysis sessions. Previously voluntary, the analysis of practice has become compulsory for a minimum of six hours per year, including two hours per term, without the presence of children, in sessions led by qualified professionals, with no hierarchy and without the presence of management. Should we be happy that the analysis of practice is becoming obligatory? Should we fear that the analysis of practice will metamorphose into a space for the transmission of “good practices”?This work of problematizing a professional practice, which on a daily basis often remains solitary, requires much more than the six hours per year provided for in the 2021 law. It requires the involvement of professionals, respect for trial and error, the assurance that doubts, uncertainties, will be able to be expressed without judgment or the imposition to think according to norms and standards.
690			_aprescribed work-real work
690			_aearly childhood
690			_alegislation
690			_aanalysis of practice
690			_aprescribed work-real work
690			_aearly childhood
690			_alegislation
690			_aanalysis of practice
786	0		_nSociographe | o 85 | 1 | 2024-02-15 | p. 111-123 | 1297-6628
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-sociographe-2024-1-page-111?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c493333 _d493333