000			01823cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121080703.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aLoyer, Barbara _eauthor
245	0	0	_aConflict and Conflict’s Representations in the Basque Country: The End of the ETA
260			_c2015.
500			_a84
520			_aThe 20th of October 2011, ETAannounced the suspension of the armedstruggle after negotiations within the BasqueNational Liberation Movement (MLNV)where a strong rivalry opposed on onehand, the proponents of the use of murder tobecome independent and, on the other hand,those who thought that the ballot would bea more effective weapon. Today ETA continues its communication on the managementof a qualified transition situation of “postconflict” with “an international verificationcommission” composed of prestigious foreigners, supposed to implement interventionsin a modeled phasing: secret negotiations,peace conference, disarmament, as if theBasque country were emerging from a war.Why do Basque terrorists need to complywith the international post-conflict model,when there is no disaster areas, no refugees,no institutional normalization nor statebuilding to implement? In fact, two pointsof view are confronted on the interpretationof ETA actions: on one side, the Basquenationalists are trying to impose a narrativeof the conflict that legitimizes terrorism inthe name of freedom of the Basque peopleagainst an oppressive regime, on the otherside, political groups or civilians are fightingto obtain that ETA enters history as a terrorist organization and totalitarian defeated bya democratic society.
786	0		_nHérodote | o 158 | 3 | 2015-11-16 | p. 16-38 | 0338-487X
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-herodote-2015-3-page-16?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c496174 _d496174