000			01351cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121082329.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aLe Guay, Damien _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFor an ethics of commitment
260			_c2009.
500			_a89
520			_aToday, commitment is difficult, if not impossible: we live in a world of “individualism of disconnection” (according to Marcel Gauchet), one that is more gaseous than solid. Once upon a time, commitment was automatic, today it has become a problem. We therefore need to relearn it, to revisit its foundations and its successive layers. Here we will distinguish between two commitment “models”: “sign-up commitment” (modeled on a contract) and “engagement commitment” (modeled on an alliance). The former, more “modern” than the latter, can be withdrawn, it is limited in time, while the second form adds an “ethical weight” to one’s “word”—one that is given and forms an engagement. This makes for a better understanding of the commitment made by service men and women and its specificities: a vocation, a feeling for the corps one joins, the shared common values.
786	0		_nInflexions | o 12 | 3 | 2009-09-01 | p. 143-155 | 1772-3760
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-inflexions-2009-3-page-143?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c500119 _d500119