000			01567cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121082710.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aImmarigeon, Jean-Philippe _eauthor
245	0	0	_aIllegitimate violence
260			_c2016.
500			_a59
520			_aWith a domestic crisis and war in the East, France suddenly seemed to be caught between a rock and a hard place, and was thrown into this post-2001 world from which it had believed it could isolate itself during an Iraq war that was presented from the outset as the premise of a clash of civilisations. With pressure coming from all sides, France felt obliged to conform to the security excesses that were already at work across the Atlantic. It was a mistake that risked proving fatal. France’s entire and very distinctive history—above and beyond wars and revolutions—has been built on very balanced philosophical thought and on the patient construction of a state of law and a legal system which have been its strength. Today, however, there is an attempt to convince France that these foundations are not only out-of-date but weaken her in a world one again governed by arbitrary rule. Except that the rhetoric about a monopoly of violence characterising the modern State forgets one thing: the sovereign people still remains, in fine, sole custodian of legitimate violence, and sole judge of its use.
786	0		_nInflexions | o 31 | 1 | 2016-01-01 | p. 81-94 | 1772-3760
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-inflexions-2016-1-page-81?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c501336 _d501336