000			01832cam a2200301 4500500
005			20250121083406.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_ade la Pallière, Nadine _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Goullet, Catherine _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Guyvarc’h, Annaïck _eauthor
245	0	0	_aCommons and innovation: A paradoxical relationship
260			_c2023.
500			_a27
520			_aFrom the beginning of the 1980s, many large firms had to face a veritable cultural revolution, the NIH, Not Invented Here. The model of innovation strictly integrated into the space of big business had died and had to open up to external resources. From then on, innovation processes relied more and more on social structures, market or non-market, in which the effects of geographical proximity could, under certain conditions, play a favorable role. Would this collective dimension of the source of innovations confer on them a predisposition to be governed as commons? In any case, this is the direction that many players have adopted, emphasizing the sharing of resources. However, the competitive nature of the economy and therefore of the behavior of firms most often leads to the eventual re-appropriation of innovations in the business space, supported by the strengthening of intellectual property protection regimeJEL Codes: H41, L17, O31, O34, O36
690			_aIntellectual Property
690			_aInnovation
690			_aOpen Innovation
690			_aGovernance
690			_aCommons
690			_aIntellectual Property
690			_aInnovation
690			_aOpen Innovation
690			_aGovernance
690			_aCommons
786	0		_nInnovations | o 72 | 3 | 2023-08-29 | p. 149-179 | 1267-4982
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-innovations-2023-3-page-149?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c503118 _d503118