000			01869cam a2200229 4500500
005			20250121083500.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aMontagne, Annabelle _eauthor
245	0	0	_aQuestioning the concept of structure
260			_c2017.
500			_a61
520			_aThe concepts of the break or continuum between normal and pathological have changed over time, under the influence of the pursuit of social norms. And in psychiatry, the diagnostic assessment of pathology is also subject to this influence, involving various disciplinary bodies of knowledge depending on different theoretical points of view and practices. The concept of psychic structure illustrates the current discrepancy between the psychological body and the medico-psychiatric body. However, if the current trend is toward American-style classification, the reality on the ground incites us to consider the meaning of the symptom, in the psychoanalytical sense. Beyond restrictively theoretical constraints, how can we reconcile the DSM approach and the structural, essentially psychoanalytical approach? How can we mobilize the ethic of both professions, each of which is often confined to a theoretical paradigm which, while not obsolete, sometimes lacks flexibility? The future of the “madman” of our societies depends upon it. It is our duty to question our perceptual schemas of mental illness, and to continue the movement of the re-humanization of madness initiated in the fifties.
690			_apsychiatry
690			_aDSM
690			_adiagnosis
690			_apsychic structure
690			_apsychoanalysis
690			_aevaluation
786	0		_nL'information psychiatrique | Volume 93 | 5 | 2017-06-01 | p. 399-404 | 0020-0204
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-l-information-psychiatrique-2017-5-page-399?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c503287 _d503287