| 000 | 01374cam a2200289zu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 88914222 | ||
| 003 | FRCYB88914222 | ||
| 005 | 20250107174309.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr un | ||
| 008 | 250107s2021 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9783631846407 | ||
| 035 | _aFRCYB88914222 | ||
| 040 |
_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aKieltyka, Robert | |
| 245 | 0 | 1 |
_aOccupational Inequality and Sex-Role Stereotyping in Dictionaries of English: A Causal Link? _c['Kieltyka, Robert', 'Osuchowska, Dorota'] |
| 264 | 1 |
_bPeter Lang _c2021 |
|
| 300 | _a p. | ||
| 336 |
_btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_bc _2rdamdedia |
||
| 338 |
_bc _2rdacarrier |
||
| 650 | 0 | _a | |
| 700 | 0 | _aKieltyka, Robert | |
| 700 | 0 | _aOsuchowska, Dorota | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88914222 _qtext/html _a |
| 520 | _aHave dictionaries of English indeed affected their users’ predisposition towards women to such an extent that we can posit a causal relation between what they propose and some of the forms of occupational sexism that still exist? Applying a data-collection methodology that has not been previously resorted to in any studies into the portrayal of women in these dictionaries challenges such a claim: the real exposure to sexist content is actually smaller than previous work is suggesting. | ||
| 999 |
_c50533 _d50533 |
||