000			01464cam a2200157 4500500
005			20250121090842.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aHalimi, Brice _eauthor
245	0	0	_aSurrogate acquaintance
260			_c2019.
500			_a52
520			_aIs the acquaintance of an attribute of the same nature as that of an individual? Of course, the reduction of attributes to universals, and thus to objects, leads one to an immediate positive answer. But what about attributes in predicate positions? This article aims to argue in favor of the univocity of acquaintance, by showing that acquaintance of predicates is, despite significant differences, similar to acquaintance of individuals. To do so, the issue will be tackled from a negative angle, namely through the consideration of how, in each case, a lacking acquaintance comes to be replaced. Using an epistemic interpretation of the theory along the lines of those in Principia Mathematica that are justified for independent reasons, this perspective leads us to understand the axiom of reducibility as a principle of surrogate acquaintance for predicates, a principle whose epistemic and logical scheme is shared by Russell’s analysis of definite descriptions of individuals.
786	0		_nLes Études philosophiques | o 130 | 3 | 2019-08-06 | p. 369-384 | 0014-2166
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-les-etudes-philosophiques-2019-3-page-369?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c510464 _d510464