000			01678cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121093038.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aAshley Hudson, Bryant _eauthor
245	0	0	_aFuck, fuck, fuck: Reflexivity and fidelity in reporting swearwords in management research
260			_c2020.
500			_a74
520			_aIn this essay, I confront a problem I encountered at a recentacademic conference wherein the words and sentiments of research respondents were unfortunately and unnecessarily silenced and edited – perhaps due to presenters’ unfortunate and needless regard for the supposed impropriety of the respondents’ language. I argue that such silencing and editing is not only unfaithful to our respondents; it is also unfaithful to our project as social scientists. I briefly review some of the literature on qualitative interviewing and the importance of positionality, relationality and reflexivity between the interviewer and the participant. I apply some of these prescriptions to the reporting of data in presentations and manuscripts. I then point out some examples of how rude or swearwords have been appropriately used in management and other journals and end with a plea that we remain true to the language and settings that are so important for our understanding of social and organizational life.
690			_areflexivity
690			_ainterpretative research
690			_afidelity
690			_adatapresentation
690			_aswearwords
786	0		_nM@n@gement | 22 | 3 | 2020-04-01 | p. 487-495 | 1286-4692
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-management-2019-3-page-487?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c515371 _d515371