| 000 | 01187cam a2200181 4500500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250121093539.0 | ||
| 041 | _afre | ||
| 042 | _adc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 |
_aGuillot-Soulez, Chloé _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Soulez, Sébastien _eauthor |
| 700 | 1 | 0 |
_a Viot, Catherine _eauthor |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aEmployer label and/or regional brand: What signals should be prioritized in recruitment communications to improve organizational attractiveness? |
| 260 | _c2022. | ||
| 500 | _a30 | ||
| 520 | _aThis study explores how organizational attractiveness is affected by the separate or simultaneous presence of location and employer signals in a recruitment advertisement. The findings show that linking employer branding and territorial branding does not necessarily improve recruitment communication. The regional logo significantly influences employer attractiveness when not associated with the employer label. Furthermore, the better the image of the city, the stronger the influence of the regional logo. | ||
| 786 | 0 | _nManagement & Avenir | 127 | 1 | 2022-03-15 | p. 35-57 | 1768-5958 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-management-et-avenir-2022-1-page-35?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080 |
| 999 |
_c516198 _d516198 |
||