000			01824cam a2200265 4500500
005			20250121093641.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBoulanger, Éric _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Constantin, Christian _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Deblock, Christian _eauthor
245	0	0	_aRegionalism in Asia: One Building Site, Three Patterns
260			_c2008.
500			_a62
520			_aFor a decade now, Asia's regionalism has been in mutation. There has been a proliferation of economic agreements and institutional arrangements bundled together without much coherence. These regional dynamics reflect the diversity in understandings and interests among Asia's great power, and they have resulted in a form of regionalism that is different from past American and European experiences but whose ultimate form remains uncertain. This uncertainty comes from the confrontation of American, Chinese, and Japanese views of the optimal institutional arrangement for Asia, which leaves ASEAN as Asia's regional cornerstone. This paper first reviews different theoretical views of the New Regionalism in Asia and compares the approaches of the region's main powers. It then concludes that Asia's regional institutional forms arise from the pacific coexistence and competition of various visions and practices of regionalism: ASEAN+3 (favored by China), the Asian Summit (favored by Japan), and the Asia-Pacific approach (favored by the US).
690			_aregionalism
690			_aEast Asia
690			_aJapan
690			_aUnited States
690			_aChina
690			_aASEAN
690			_aintegration
786	0		_nMondes en développement | o 144 | 4 | 2008-12-04 | p. 91-114 | 0302-3052
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-mondes-en-developpement-2008-4-page-91?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c516476 _d516476