| 000 | 02345cam a2200277zu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 88918954 | ||
| 003 | FRCYB88918954 | ||
| 005 | 20250107175602.0 | ||
| 006 | m o d | ||
| 007 | cr un | ||
| 008 | 250107s2021 fr | o|||||0|0|||eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9781433186431 | ||
| 035 | _aFRCYB88918954 | ||
| 040 |
_aFR-PaCSA _ben _c _erda |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aInoguchi, Takashi | |
| 245 | 0 | 1 |
_aJapan’s International Relations at the Crossroads _bWars, Globalization and Japanese Theorizings in the Extended Twentieth Century _c['Inoguchi, Takashi'] |
| 264 | 1 |
_bPeter Lang _c2021 |
|
| 300 | _a p. | ||
| 336 |
_btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_bc _2rdamdedia |
||
| 338 |
_bc _2rdacarrier |
||
| 650 | 0 | _a | |
| 700 | 0 | _aInoguchi, Takashi | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_2Cyberlibris _uhttps://international.scholarvox.com/netsen/book/88918954 _qtext/html _a |
| 520 | _aThis book discusses Japan’s international relations prior to 1945 with its focus on war and after 1945 during the Cold War era with its focus on globalization and also examines Japan’s international relations as an academic discipline. Part I describes and analyzes (1) how modern Japan coped with the coerced opening of the country, (2) how major powers aspired and alternated their hegemonic positions in East Asia in the extended twentieth century and (3) how global politics has been evolving with the three distinctive paradigms: the Westphalian, Philadelphian and Anti_Utopian. Part II describes and analyzes (1) how Japan foresees the future on the eve of the Cold War: the metamorphosis from Pax Americana Phase II to Pax Consortis, (2) how Japan envisages regionalism in Asia with sub_nationally and functionally articulated ideas for East and Southeast Asia, (3) Japan’s 21st century manifesto of foreign policy is presented as the best mix of classical realism, transformative pragmatism and liberal internationalism and (4) Japan’s manifesto as an Asian state is to deploy manufacturing/technological statecraft on the basis of East Asian peace. Part III focuses on theorizings of international relations from various angles. In light of hyperglobalization, theorizing global politics (as distinguished from international politics) is called for with two latest studies on global quasi_legislative politics and typology of Asian societies given as examples. | ||
| 999 |
_c51670 _d51670 |
||