000			02059cam a2200313 4500500
005			20250121094646.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVicari, Stefano _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Giaufret, Anna _eauthor
245	0	0	_aMultilingualism and minority denominations in Amnesty International’s annual reports: LGBTi community and displaced persons
260			_c2022.
500			_a23
520			_aIn this study, we will analyse Amnesty International’s 2016/17, 2017/18 and 2019 annual reports in their English, French and Italian versions (two strategic languages, one tactical), to show the discursive strategies deployed by Amnesty International in the different languages to affirm the need for respect for fundamental human rights and the perils that threaten their very existence in the contexts where the NGO operates. Following a general presentation of these discursive and argumentative strategies in the three languages, we will look in more detail at those used to name (or not to name, in pursuit of a strategy of generalisation, using different means depending on the language used) certain ethnic, religious and social minorities considered “vulnerable” (Abbas et al., 2019) and whose fundamental rights this organisation aims to safeguard.We therefore propose to show how these names and expressions are conveyed in the translated discourses, namely, their co-occurrences, their co-texts, their uses and possible discrepancies in meaning between the different versions of the reports.
690			_aLGBTi
690			_amultilingualism
690			_aNGOs
690			_adisplaced persons
690			_alanguage policy
690			_avulnerability
690			_aLGBTi
690			_amultilingualism
690			_aNGOs
690			_adisplaced persons
690			_alanguage policy
690			_avulnerability
786	0		_nMots. Les langages du politique | o 128 | 1 | 2022-04-11 | p. 105-124 | 0243-6450
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-mots-2022-1-page-105?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c518176 _d518176