000			02175cam a2200301 4500500
005			20250121094753.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aGiacomoni, Gilbert _eauthor
245	0	0	_aParticipatory financing of sustainable entrepreneurship: A postmodern Markowitz portfolio theory
260			_c2023.
500			_a9
520			_aSustainable finance integrates, to one degree or another, environmental, social and governance considerations into investment decisions. It works for the common good but faces a theoretical gap: the foundational concept of common utility makes no economic sense. By default, common good relates to extra-financial reporting, not-sophisticated investors and outside banking channels trading (such as crowdfunding). The intent of the paper is, from a behavioral economics perspective, to model the reasoning and decision behaviors of both sophisticated and not-sophisticated investors, while common utility measures the satisfaction (vs dissatisfaction) or welfare (vs discomfort) that the greatest number finds in the consumption or the obtaining of the common good by a small number. Common utility can therefore be understood relatively, as an original utility at stake at a time when it ensured the survival of mankind and when property had not yet begun to threaten the common good and cause its downfall (Tragedy of the commons). Its coupling with Markowitz’s modern portfolio theory gives a postmodern version of it, at the service of sustainable finance and with experiments in sustainable entrepreneurship.
690			_aCommon utility
690			_aCrowdfunding
690			_aSustainable entrepreneurship
690			_aSustainable finance
690			_aCommon good
690			_aRisk-return
690			_aCommon utility
690			_aCrowdfunding
690			_aSustainable entrepreneurship
690			_aSustainable finance
690			_aCommon good
690			_aRisk-return
786	0		_nManagement & Sciences Sociales | o 35 | 2 | 2023-12-13 | p. 164-183 | 1952-3262
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-management-et-sciences-sociales-2023-2-page-164?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c518370 _d518370