000			01484cam a2200217 4500500
005			20250121100808.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aVivet, Emmanuel _eauthor
245	0	0	_aProcess Innovations and Rapidity of Decision-making in European Negotiations: The Example of the Climate Package
260			_c2011.
500			_a78
520			_aThis paper examines the means that were used by the Presidency and the European Commission to overcome obstacles and arrive at an agreement following important European environmental negotiations that took place in Brussels in autumn 2008. We focus on the effect of time pressure first on the negotiations, and second on the management of the process. In this case, the process is understood to mean the planning of the negotiations in the broader sense. This planning gave rise to a reduction in the timeframe and space in which talks took place, which accounts in part for their leading to an agreement. We also examine the effect of the fact that the normal qualified majority voting procedure was abandoned in favor of a procedure that was more demanding in terms of consensus.
690			_atime pressure
690			_aEuropean Union
690			_amultiparty negotiations
690			_aprocess
690			_aconsensus-building
786	0		_nNégociations | o 15 | 1 | 2011-07-01 | p. 89-101 | 1780-9231
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-negociations-2011-1-page-89?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c523311 _d523311