000			02059cam a2200265 4500500
005			20250121102048.0
041			_afre
042			_adc
100	1	0	_aBarré, Rémi _eauthor
700	1	0	_a Jollivet, Marcel _eauthor
245	0	0	_aInterdisciplinarity and participatory research: two research regimes for the ecological and solidarity transition. A programmatic perspective
260			_c2023.
500			_a40
520			_aThe authors start by acknowledging that, in response to the specificities of research on issues to the environment, sustainable development and the socio-ecological transition (taking into account their complexity and action-orientation), two successive innovations have emerged: interdisciplinarity and participatory research. The authors refer to the notion of ‘research regime’ to question what has happened with the first – which reached its peak in the 80’s – in order to draw lessons for the second, which is on the rise since the 2000’s. They consider that interdisciplinarity has not succeeded in becoming an acknowledged research regime, due to lacking further in depth investigation of its practical and epistemological foundations. They conclude that, despite its increasing attraction, participatory research runs the same risk if it also omits investigating deeper into its foundations. They outline orientations for the research policy needed to overcome this risk. At stake is the establishment of a research regime particularly adapted to addressing the concerns and demands of the social and ecological transition.
690			_aparticipatory research
690			_aresearch regime
690			_ainterdisciplinarity
690			_aresearch policy
690			_aparticipatory research
690			_aresearch regime
690			_ainterdisciplinarity
690			_aresearch policy
786	0		_nNatures Sciences Sociétés | 31 | 1 | 2023-07-03 | p. 110-119 | 1240-1307
856	4	1	_uhttps://shs.cairn.info/journal-natures-sciences-societes-2023-1-page-110?lang=en&redirect-ssocas=7080
999			_c526568 _d526568